Comments on: Face Recognition http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/ The art of keeping up with yesterday's blogging Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:12:02 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Baloch khan http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5180 Baloch khan Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:49:21 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5180 <p>no comments</p> no comments

]]> By: hiskia http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5179 hiskia Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:17:23 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5179 <p>i need written code in any languge(6.0) of face recognition..thanx</p> i need written code in any languge(6.0) of face recognition..thanx

]]> By: Zack http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5178 Zack Sat, 24 Jan 2004 04:20:59 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5178 <p>ravindra: If you google, I am sure you can find some research code for face recognition. I don’t have any publicly available code myself.</p> ravindra: If you google, I am sure you can find some research code for face recognition. I don’t have any publicly available code myself.

]]> By: ravindra http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5177 ravindra Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:45:12 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5177 <p>i need written code in any languge(6.0) of face recognition..thanx</p> i need written code in any languge(6.0) of face recognition..thanx

]]> By: Zack http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5176 Zack Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:34:55 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5176 <p>hiba: Sorry, can’t help you there.</p> hiba: Sorry, can’t help you there.

]]> By: hiba http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5175 hiba Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:34:41 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5175 <p>i need written code in visual basic languge(6.0) of face recognition..thanx</p> i need written code in visual basic languge(6.0) of face recognition..thanx

]]> By: hiba http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5174 hiba Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:34:10 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5174 <p>i need written code in visual basic languge(6.0) in face recognition..thanx</p> i need written code in visual basic languge(6.0) in face recognition..thanx

]]> By: Zack http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5173 Zack Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:36:19 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5173 <p>Chenghua: There has been a lot of similar research. Do you have a link for Dr. G. Gordon’s work?</p> Chenghua: There has been a lot of similar research. Do you have a link for Dr. G. Gordon’s work?

]]> By: Chenghua http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5172 Chenghua Sat, 19 Jul 2003 13:24:20 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5172 <p>Dr. G. Gordon did the similar work in 1991. So it is not novel. Besides, the recognition accuracy is not goog as they described.</p> Dr. G. Gordon did the similar work in 1991. So it is not novel. Besides, the recognition accuracy is not goog as they described.

]]> By: Zack http://www.zackvision.com/weblog/2003/03/face-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-5171 Zack Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:52:00 +0000 http://www.zackvision.com/?p=64#comment-5171 <p>Even there I am not sure. There has been work done using 3-D geometric models of the face using two or three cameras. If the acquisition of the image is in a controlled seeting, those techniques will work without requiring a range scanner.<br /><br /> <br /><br /> I am not saying it is bad research; it has its uses. However, I don’t see the practical benefits. Just like my research!<br /></p> Even there I am not sure. There has been work done using 3-D geometric models of the face using two or three cameras. If the acquisition of the image is in a controlled seeting, those techniques will work without requiring a range scanner.

I am not saying it is bad research; it has its uses. However, I don’t see the practical benefits. Just like my research!

]]>