Forced Marriage in Islam: Post #2

Previous Posts of this series: Cousin Marriage and Forced Marriage in Pakistan.

I did some research for this post. Actually, I asked my sister to tell me what Abdur Rahman Al-Jazairi had to say about the topic in his book “Kitab-ul-Fiqh alal-Madhahib al-Arba’a” (Book of fiqh according to the four schools [mentioned in this post] of jurisprudence). So thanks to her as she translated the Urdu text (the original book is in Arabic but my parents have the Urdu translation for the benefit of my Dad and us since my Mom’s mother tongue is Arabic) over Yahoo Messenger.

We’ll start with our friend the modernist Moiz Amjad.

As far as the teachings and recommendations of the Shari`ah regarding a Nikah (marriage) ceremony are concerned, the basic necessary ingredients that should be present in a marriage, according to the recommendations of Islam, are:

  1. Marriage should primarily be a contract that materializes from the expression of the intent of a man and a woman to live the rest of their lives as husband and wife. This contract should be based on the free consent of the man and the woman. In other words, it should not be a temporary contract (i.e. a marital contract for a specified period of time) or one, which is based on coercion and force.
  2. There should be a general declaration of the marriage in the society. Islam does not recognize a secret marital contract. The declaration of the marriage may take any shape or form that is generally adopted in the society. For instance, inviting friends and relatives to the marriage ceremony is an acceptable method of this declaration. Holding two or more persons as witnesses to the marriage contract is also a legislated method for such declaration adopted in various societies and cultures.
  3. The man should give a mutually agreed upon amount as what the Islamic Shari`ah (law) terms as ‘Mehr’ to the woman. The factors that may be considered in the settlement of the amount of ‘Mehr’ include the financial position and the social status of the man and the woman. A woman may refuse marriage merely on the basis of the fact that she considers the amount of ‘Mehr’ to be inadequate. ‘Mehr’ is a basically a token from the man, given to his wife, to express and symbolize the fact that he is willing and capable to fulfill the financial responsibility of the family that would be formed subsequent to the marriage contract. It may be mentioned here that although Islam does not prohibit a woman to take up a financial activity of her choice, yet puts the ultimate responsibility of providing for the family on the husband.

Now that seems simple and reasonable. But we don’t call him modernist for nothing. Let’s now hear from Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid.

There are three pillars or conditions for the marriage contract in Islam:

  1. Both parties should be free of any obstacles that might prevent the marriage from being valid, such as their being mahrams of one another (i.e., close relatives who are permanently forbidden to marry), whether this relationship is through blood ties or through breastfeeding (radaa’) etc., or where the man is a kaafir (non-Muslim) and the woman is a Muslim, and so on.
  2. There should be an offer or proposal (eejaab) from the wali or the person who is acting in his place, who should say to the groom “I marry so-and-so to you” or similar words.
  3. There should be an expression of acceptance (qabool) on the part of the groom or whoever is acting in his place, who should say, “I accept,” or similar words.

The conditions of a proper nikaah (marriage contract) are as follows:

  1. Both the bride and groom should be clearly identified, whether by stating their names or describing them, etc.
  2. Both the bride and groom should be pleased with one another, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No previously-married woman (widow or divorcee) may be married until she has been asked about her wishes (i.e., she should state clearly her wishes), and no virgin should be married until her permission has been asked (i.e., until she has agreed either in words or by remaining silent).” They asked, “O Messenger of Allaah, how is her permission given (because she will feel very shy)?” He said: “By her silence.” (Reported by al-Bukhaari, 4741)
  3. The one who does the contract on the woman’s behalf should be her wali, as Allaah addressed the walis with regard to marriage (interpretation of the meaning): “And marry those among you who are single…” [al-Noor 24:32] and because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Any woman who marries without the permission of her wali, her marriage is invalid, her marriage is invalid, her marriage is invalid.” (Reported by al-Tirmidhi, 1021 and others; it is a saheeh hadeeth)
  4. The marriage contract must be witnessed, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “There is no marriage contract except with a wali and two witnesses.” (Reported by al-Tabaraani; see also Saheeh al-Jaami’, 7558)

It is also important that the marriage be announced, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Announce marriages.” (Reported by Imaam Ahmad; classed as hasan in Saheeh al-Jaami’, 1027).

Now who is this wali and why is his consent needed?

The conditions of the wali are as follows:

  1. He should be of sound mind.
  2. He should be an adult.
  3. He should be free (not a slave).
  4. He should be of the same religion as the bride. A kaafir cannot be the wali of a Muslim, male or female, and a Muslim cannot be the wali of a kaafir, male or female, but a kaafir can be the wali of a kaafir woman for marriage purposes, even if they are of different religions. An apostate (one who has left Islam) cannot be a wali for anybody.
  5. He should be of good character (`adaalah —- includes piety, attitude, conduct, etc.), as opposed to being corrupt. This is a condition laid down by some scholars, although some of them regard the outward appearance of good character as being sufficient, and some say that it is enough if he is judged as being able to pay proper attention to the interests of the woman for whom he is acting as wali in the matter of her marriage.
  6. He should be male, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No woman may conduct the marriage contract of another woman, and no woman can conduct the marriage contract on behalf of her own self, because the zaaniyah (fornicatress, adulteress) is the one who arranges things on her own behalf.” (Reported by Ibn Maajah, 1782; see also Saheeh al-Jaami’, 7298)
  7. He should be wise and mature (rushd), which means being able to understand matters of compatibility and the interests of marriage.

The fuqahaa’ put possible walis in a certain order, and a wali who is more closely-related should not be ignored unless there is no such person or the relatives do not meet the specified conditions. A woman’s wali is her father, then whoever her father may have appointed before his death, then her paternal grandfather or great-grandfather, then her son, then her grandfathers sons or grandsons, then her brother through both parents (full brother), then her brother through her father, then the sons of her brother through both parents, then the sons of her brother through her father, then her uncle (her father’s brother through both parents), then her father’s brother through the father, then the sons of her father’s brother though both parents, then the sons of her father’s brother through the father, then whoever is more closely related, and so on —- as is the case with inheritance. The Muslim leader (or his deputy, such as a qaadi or judge) is the wali for any woman who does not have a wali of her own.

So it seems that the bride and the groom have to consent to their marriage. However, the hadith cited by the Sheikh equating silence with consent is misused a LOT in practice. There might be cases where the bride clearly refuses to marry but in most of the the forced marriages she only has to stay quiet. That is a low hurdle and should be unacceptable. There are maulvis/Nikah registrars in Pakistan that insist on a clear verbal reply from the bride. Obviously those are not called for the Nikah ceremony by people bent on forcibly marrying someone.

We will return to the wali issue later. Let’s first hear Moiz Amjad’s clear reply to a woman who had been forcibly married by her parents.

No one, not even the parents, have a right to force marriage upon any boy or a girl. Without the free consent of the woman (as well as the man), a marriage contract would be deemed void. Forcing marriage upon a woman is clearly against the teachings of the Prophet (pbuh).

According to a narrative reported by Abu Dawood, once when a case of forced marriage was reported to the Prophet (pbuh), he allowed the woman (who was forced into marriage) the option to revoke the marriage, if she desired to do so (Abu Dawood, Kitaab al-Nikah, Narrative No. 1797).

The free choice of the woman is a necessary condition for a valid Nikah. In view of this fact, if it is found out that a woman has been coerced into a Nikah, then such a Nikah can be revoked or even invalidated by the competent legal authority.

Nevertheless, considering the fact that you have signed the Nikah contract, you will now have to seek legal help to invalidate the Nikah, if your parents do not accept your basic moral and legal right.

Because you have been forced into marriage, therefore, your apparent husband does not have any moral or legal rights over you, till the time that you give him such rights, with the willingness of your heart. Under the stated circumstances, I do not consider it sinful on your part to refuse talking to him or to seek legal help in revoking the said marriage contract.

Back to the matter of the wali. There is this reply to a question about court marriage on Moiz Amjad’s site:

The Islamic Shari`ah does not prohibit any two adult persons from entering the bonds of marriage. However there are certain conditions, which need to be met. First, the consent of both the male and the female partner is necessary. Second, the Nikah should be declared in the society and must not be kept hidden. The Qur’an guides us that the contract of Nikah should be undertaken in the manner that is recognized, supported and followed by the honorable and noble people of a society. Social norms usually demand a consent and backing from the parents. However, if a parent does not give the right of entering the bond of marriage to their children and shows excessive unfounded resistance then the matter may be dealt as the situation demands. One may, under such circumstances, turn to the court and make the marriage contract there. Nevertheless, the best course would be to do every effort to get the parents’ consent so that the step of going to the court may be avoided.

If wali’s consent is not required, then what is the deal? Here’s how Shehzad Saleem explains it on Moiz’s site (Moiz does not necessarily endorse this opinion).

Islam on the other hand, as mentioned earlier, has always insisted that the institution of family is the basic building block of the society and it is in the interest of humanity to adhere to a family oriented society. Consequently, it has given a number of directives for the protection and preservation of the family.

[…]Among these directives also comes the Prophet’s hadith the interpretation of which has become the centre of controversy these days:

A Nikah does not solemnise unless it takes place through the guardian and if someone does not have a guardian the ruler of the Muslims is his guardian. (Tirmizii Kitaab-un- nikah)

This hadith is actually a corollary of the social directives of Islam pertaining to the institution of family and is based on great wisdom. Since the preservation and protection of the family set up is of paramount importance to Islam, it is but natural that each marriage take place through the consent of the parents who are the foremost guardians. It is obvious that a marriage solemnised through the consent of the parents shields and shelters the newly formed family. For reasons stated earlier, it is essential that the newly formed family be part of another larger family.

However, as is evident from the hadith also, there can always be an exception to this general principle. If a man and a woman feel that the rejection on the part of the parents has no sound reasoning behind it or that the parents, owing to some reason, are not appreciating the grounds of this union, they have all the right to take this matter to the courts of justice. It is now up to the court to analyse and evaluate the whole affair. If it is satisfied with the stance of the man and woman, it can give a green signal to them. In this case, as is apparent from the hadith, the state shall be considered the guardian of the couple. On the other hand, if the court is of the view that the stand of the parents is valid, it can stop the concerned parties from engaging in wedlock. Similarly, if a case is brought before the judicial forums in which the marriage has taken place without the consent of the parents, it is up to the court to decide the fate of such a liaison. If it is not satisfied with the grounds of this union, it can order for their separation and if it is satisfied, it can endorse the decision taken by the couple.

This is the law as far as this issue is concerned. However, it is evident that laws mostly cater for extreme situations as their nature is preventive not reformatory. In other words, they prevent the spreading of anarchy and disorder in a society but have no role in positively building a society on a certain ideology. It is the utmost goal of Islam to build a society in which traditions are so deeply rooted that various affairs are settled and resolved within the social structure without taking them to the courts. Family affairs, if taken to the courts, become the talk of the town and severely damage the standing and reputation of the parties involved. Consequently, it is in the interest of the parties involved to settle their differences mutually by giving due importance to the ultimate goal of protecting the institution of family.

The society which, we believe, Islam wants to build is one in which the relationship between parents and children is based on such norms and values as protect the family set up. In such a society, if an individual has to select a life partner for himself or herself, he or she must make the utmost effort to convince the parents. In differences of opinion it seems proper that the individual accommodate the opinion of the parents as far as possible, and only in extraordinary circumstances should he persist in his decision. An individual no doubt has total freedom in decision making in this regard but he should give top priority to the protection of the institution of family. This freedom is so absolute that Islam disapproves of parents who forcibly marry their sons and daughters and makes it clear that it is the concerned man and woman who have the final say in this regard:

A girl once came to ‘A’isha and said ‘My father has married me to his nephew to alleviate his poverty through me. I dislike him.’ ‘A’isha replied ‘Wait here until the Prophet comes.’ The Prophet arrived shortly and she informed him of the matter. At this, the Prophet sent for her father. When he arrived the Prophet gave the girl the choice to do whatever she liked. She said: ‘I accept my father’s decision. I only wanted to know whether a girl has authority in this regard or not’. (Nisaii, Kitab-un-nikaah)

If in a society envisaged by Islam it is important that an individual give due regard to the opinion of the parents in marriage, it is even more important that the parents be extra cautious in this matter since they hold moral authority over their children. Misuse and abuse of such authority can produce grave consequences. Parents must give deep consideration to the inclinations and tendencies of their children in deciding their future in an affair as delicate as marriage. They should understand that once their children become mentally mature they must not impose their ideas on them.

The Sheikh is more adamant about obeying parents, though he thinks there is some leeway.

Consent is essential in the case of the husband, and also in the case of the wife. The parents have no right to force their son or their daughter to marry someone they do not want.

But if the person whom the parents have chosen is righteous, then the child, whether male or female, should obey the parents in that, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “If there comes to you one with whose religious commitment and character you are pleased, then marry (your daughter) to him.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 1084; Ibn Maajah, 1967. Classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi, 865).

But if obeying them will lead to divorce later on, then the child does not have to obey them in that, because consent is the foundation of the marital relationship, and this consent must be in accordance with sharee’ah, which is approval of the one who is religiously committed and of good character.

A child is not considered to be disobedient or sinful if he does not obey his parents in this regard.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: The parents do not have the right to force their child to marry someone whom he does not want, and if he refuses he is not being disobedient towards them, as is the case when he does not eat what he does not want.

Now let us see the Sheikh present some evidence for his case:

It is not permissible for a man to marry a woman without the permission of her guardian, whether she is a virgin or previously-married. This is the view of the majority of scholars, including al-Shaafa’i, Maalik and Ahmad. This is based on evidence which includes the following:

The verses in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “do not prevent them from marrying their (former) husbands” [al-Baqarah 2:232]

“And do not marry Al-Mushrikaat (idolatresses) till they believe (worship Allaah Alone)” [al-Baqarah 2:221]

“and marry those among you who are single” [al-Noor 24:32]

The point here is that these verses clearly stipulate that there be a guardian in marriage, because Allaah is addressing the guardian with regard to the marriage of the woman under his care. If the matter were up to her and not him, there would be no need to address him.

It is indicative of Imam al-Bukhaari’s deep understanding of issues of sharee’ah that he quoted these verses in a chapter which he entitled “Baab man qaala la nikaaha illa bi wali (Chapter on those who say that there is no marriage without a guardian).”

It was narrated that Abu Moosa said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “There is no marriage without a guardian.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 1101; Abu Dawood, 2085; Ibn Maajah, 1881. Classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi, 1/318)

It was narrated that “Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: Any woman who gets married without the permission of her guardian, her marriage is invalid, her marriage is invalid, her marriage is invalid. But if the marriage is consummated then the mahr is hers because she has allowed him to be intimate with her. If they dispute, then the ruler is the guardian of the one who has no guardian.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 1102; Abu Dawood, 2083; Ibn Maajah, 1879. Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Irwa’ al-Ghaleel, 1840)

Secondly: If her guardian prevents her from marrying the person she wants for no valid reason according to sharee’ah, then the role of guardian passes to the next closest relative, so it passes from the father to the grandfather, for example.

Thirdly: if all of her guardians prevent her from getting married for no valid reason according to sharee’ah, then the ruler is her guardian, because of the hadeeth quoted above (“…If they dispute, then the ruler is the guardian of the one who has no guardian”)

Fourthly: if there is no guardian and no ruler, then her marriage is to be arranged by a man who has authority in the place where she is, such as the head of a village, or the governor of a province, and so on. If there is no such person, then she should appoint a trustworthy Muslim man to arrange her marriage.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: If there is no relative who can act as her guardian, then the position of guardian passes to the one who is most fit among those who have any kind of authority in matters other than marriage, such as the head of a village, the leader of a caravan, and so on.

Ibn Qudaamah said: If a woman does not have a guardian and there is no ruler, then there was narrated from Ahmad that which indicates that her marriage should be arranged by a man of sound character, with her permission.

Shaykh `Umar al-Ashqar said: If there is no ruler of the Muslims, or if the woman is in a place where the Muslims have no ruler, and she has no guardian at all, like the Muslims in America and elsewhere, if there are Islamic institutions in that country that take care of the Muslims’ affairs, then they should arrange her marriage. The same applies if the Muslims have a leader who is in charge or someone who is responsible for their affairs.

So can a woman decide who her wali should be? According to the Sheikh, it depends on whether her closer relative is acting wrongfully or not.

If she wants to marry someone of equal standing, and the wali wants to marry her to a different person of equal standing, and he refuses to marry her to the person whom she wants to marry, then he is preventing her from marrying [wrongfully — ed]. But if she wants to marry someone of different standing, then he has the right to stop her, and in this case he is not preventing her from marrying in the wrongful sense.

[…]If the wali refused to let a woman marry a man whose religious commitment and character are good, then guardianship passes to the next closest male relative on the father’s side, then the next closest and so on. If they refuse to arrange her marriage, as usually happens, then guardianship passes to the qaadi, and the qaadi should arrange the woman’s marriage. If the matter is referred to him and he knows that her guardians have refused to arrange her marriage, then he should do that, because he is the wali in cases where there is no specific wali.

The fuqaha’ (may Allaah have mercy on them) stated that if the wali repeatedly refuses marriage proposals from suitable men, then he is a faasiq (evildoer) and is no longer regarded as being of good character or as being a wali, rather according to the best known view of the madhhab of Imam Ahmad, he also forfeits the right to lead prayers and it is not valid to offer any congregational prayer behind him. This is a serious matter.

Some people, as we have referred to above, refuse offers of marriage from compatible men, but the girl may feel too shy to come to the qaadi to ask for her marriage to be arranged. This is something that does happen. But she should weigh the pros and cons, and decide which has the more damaging consequences, staying without a husband and letting her wali control her life according to his mood or his whims and desires, and when she grows old and no longer wants to get married, then he will arrange her marriage, or going to the qaadi and asking him to arrange her marriage because that is her right according to sharee’ah.

Undoubtedly the second alternative is preferable, which is that she should go to the qaadi and ask him to arrange her marriage, because she has the right to that.

The four schools of jurispendence differ in the details on this aspect. The Hanafis (whose followers are the most numerous) are the most lenient. According to Kitab-ul-Fiqh, an adult woman has the right to marry of her own choice. The wali (guardian) has no say whatsoever if the bride and groom are of equivalent social standing. However, if they are not of equal standing, then the guardian has a very powerful veto. He can not only refuse to marry the woman, he can also get the marriage invalidated within a year of the wedding or before the couple have a child. The other schools (Shaafi, Hanbali and Maliki) are more strict. Some of them allow a veto to the wali in all cases and some allow it only if it is the woman’s first marriage. That means that they consider widows and divorcees to be independent women.

The issues about the consent of the wali have raised their ugly head in Pakistani courts a number of times with different judgements. Here is a description of two such cases:

On 25 September 1996, a single bench of the Lahore High Court consisting of Justice Abdul Hafeez Cheema ruled that a Muslim woman may not marry without the consent of her wali or male guardian – usually the father or grandfather – and that any marriage contracted by her without this consent is void. The judgment implies that men are free to marry or re-marry without anybodys consent except that of the prospective wife while no woman, whatever her age, may validly contract her own marriage without the consent of the wali or act as the wali for her daughter.

The judgment came in cases brought by two women, Ayesha Ijaz of Toba Tek Singh and Shabina Zafar of Faisalabad who had married men of their choice. Their fathers registered cases against the two women alleging that since they had married without their walis consent, the marriages were void and they had committed the offence of zina. The two women then moved the court to have the cases quashed, arguing that they were sui juris (i.e. had the legal capacity to act independently after attaining majority) and competent in law to get married with partners of their choice. The judgement upheld that the couples be prosecuted for zina as the marriages had been consummated. The Supreme Court on 23 October 1996 suspended the judgement following the admission of the appeal; the court returned the women to their fathers custody but restrained the fathers from arranging their daughters marriage to anyone else before a Supreme Court decision. The appeal is still pending.

However, in another similar case, a three-member bench of the Lahore High Court on 10 March 1997 split 2-1 in a majority decision that the consent of the wali is not required for a marriage to be valid. Saima Wahids marriage to Arshad Ahmad had been challenged by her father whose consent she had not obtained when she contracted her marriage. She spent 11 months in a womens shelter for fear that her father might kill her.

The cases have generated extensive debate in Pakistan. Judge Cheemas ruling conflicts with previous judgments which had viewed Muslim marriage as a civil contract between men and women who were free to enter the contract if they had attained puberty and were sui juris and had the marriage performed in the presence of witnesses and on payment of dower by the groom to the bride. Women activists have argued that marriages of Pakistani Muslims are governed by the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961 which in section 5 dealing with the registration of marriages does not require the consent of the wali. The standard marriage contract, the nikahnama, prepared and printed under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, requires only the signature of the bride and groom and of two witnesses and makes no provision for the signature or recording the consent of the wali.

You should also remember that under Pakistan’s laws, a woman convicted of zina (fornication) receives severe punishment.

So what is my opinion of this? Honestly, the Hanafi position does not look lenient at all to me. It all seems so ridiculous. A woman has the full right to marry anyone she chooses to, just like a man does. Obeying and respecting parents is a good idea but marriage is quite frankly a personal matter and parents should not interfere.

Next: Having looked at cousin marriages and forced marriages, I’ll discuss an interesting intersection of the two, arranged marriages.

By Zack

Dad, gadget guy, bookworm, political animal, global nomad, cyclist, hiker, tennis player, photographer

105 comments

  1. to be fair to muslims-their problem is that so many of these laws/traditions were crystallized in the 7th-9th centuries when this was standard procedure in the “civilized” world.

  2. Thanks for providing such a detailed summary on this issue.

    To be honest, I think people will find a way to ignore rules that they don’t like, even when there is a clear statement about the matter so even if the Islamic rules were much stronger in demanding that the woman’s consent be given, we would still see a lot of this.

    Pakistan is primarily Hanafi, isn’t it? Do people mostly take advantage of the “equal social status” part to require the use of a wali? Otherwise, one would think that a Hanafi country was much more liberal than other countries.

  3. i read once that the 20% shia in pakistan comes from many families converting because it is even less strict than the hanafi….

    the turkish countries and south asia are hanafi-which explains why the

    are the most numerous and liberal-they had to deal with non-muslim populations. but i believe southeast asian is mostly shafi….

  4. To be honest, I think people will find a way to ignore rules that they don’t like, even when there is a clear statement about the matter so even if the Islamic rules were much stronger in demanding that the woman’s consent be given, we would still see a lot of this.

    True. People usually do things for lots of reasons. Religion, culture, tradition, ego, etc. are some of the reasons. I am exploring religion in this post. I do not claim that if not for Islam, these problems won’t exist. After all, forced marriages happen in Pakistan despite the fact that they are forbidden in Islam. However, as a Muslim, I like to look at Islamic jurispendence and come to my own conclusions.

    Pakistan is primarily Hanafi, isn’t it?

    Yes.

    Do people mostly take advantage of the “equal social status” part to require the use of a wali?

    I am not exactly sure, but a number of problems related to a woman marrying a man of her choice against her parents’ wishes seem to be where the man is not considered to be their equal.

  5. i read once that the 20% shia in pakistan comes from many families converting because it is even less strict than the hanafi….

    I have an interesting anecdote that’s somewhat related. Pakistan’s banks charge Zakat on your balance on the 1st of Ramazan every year. However, Shiites are allowed an exception. So if you submit an affidavit to the bank that you are shiite, they won’t deduct zakat from your account. The result is that a lot of people submit these affidavits, including an uncle of mine. According to some, if you looked at bank records, Pakistan would be majority Shiite.

  6. Thanks for your answers, Zack. I don’t know a lot about Pakistani society, and I appreciate your taking the time to explain it for me. I guess the part that interests me the most is how Pakistani traditions and customs compare to Islam, and why they diverge when they do.

    LOL at the story about the banks. People are the same everywhere when it comes to money.

  7. Out of care for my compatriot Zack I must warn that calling the hardwork and ijtihad of Imam Abu Hanifah is ridiculous is not very wise. Allah’s has warned in a hadith-e-qudsi that those who are against His friends (wali-ullahs) wage a war against Allah (like those who accept riba). (And who will win that war?) But then again why would he care about such a hadith who didn’t care about the 4 great imams.

  8. Bro Zack….How did you come to the following conclusion:

    >>>>So what is my opinion of this? Honestly, the Hanafi position does not look lenient at all to me. It all seems so ridiculous.

    How does it not look lenient and how does it look ridiculous? You just pulled those two statements out of the blue!!! Actually the Hanafees are more lenient than the other imams on this issue. And what does leniency have to do with following Islam? Do you follow what is easy and leave out what is hard? It is about time we entered into Islam fully!!

    Peace

  9. Bro Zack….How did you come to the following conclusion:

    >>>>So what is my opinion of this? Honestly, the Hanafi position does not look lenient at all to me. It all seems so ridiculous.

    How does it not look lenient and how does it look ridiculous? You just pulled those two statements out of the blue!!! Actually the Hanafees are more lenient than the other imams on this issue. And what does leniency have to do with following Islam? Do you follow what is easy and leave out what is hard? It is about time we entered into Islam fully!!

    Peace

  10. A Musalman from Pakistan: I don’t think your warning has any basis in Islam. You are misinterpreting that Hadith.

    Rayhan: The Hanafi position is definitely lenient as compared to the other 3 schools but in my opinion by not giving an adult woman the right to choose her husband without the requirement of a guardian, the Hanafi scholars have erred.

    I should have probably used some other wording instead of “lenient” though.

  11. >>>>>but in my opinion by not giving an adult woman the right to choose her husband without the requirement of a guardian, the Hanafi scholars have erred.

    with all due respect you….but you got it wrong bro….the following hanafi position is taken from http://www.ask-imam.com :

    According to Shari’ah, an adult (boy and girl) reserve the right to marry a partner of his/her choice. However, due to marriage being a major step in one’s life, it is advisable to make Mashwara (consult) with your seniors as well as make Istikhaara (seek divine guidance). Somewhere on this site, search ‘Istikhaara’ (without quotes).

    You should also consider the advise of your parents as their advise is
    motivated by their love and concern for you.

    And Allah Ta’la Knows Best.

    Was salaam

    Mufti Ebrahim Desai
    FATWA DEPT.
    _____________________________

    so can you please tell me how the Hanafi scholars have erred? you are saying the same thing what they have said since ever…..and the reason why the guardian can get it annuled later is because of their incomptibality…..because of their social differences……if she is from a rich family and he is poor…then it will be very hard for him to take care of her because the male is usually the one who brings in the cash….now that ruling could change if after marriage she has enough money to resonably fulfill her demands….otherwise they will not be compatible…….

    whatever….
    Peace

  12. >>>>>but in my opinion by not giving an adult woman the right to choose her husband without the requirement of a guardian, the Hanafi scholars have erred.

    with all due respect to you….but you got it wrong bro….the following hanafi position is taken from http://www.ask-imam.com :

    According to Shari’ah, an adult (boy and girl) reserve the right to marry a partner of his/her choice. However, due to marriage being a major step in one’s life, it is advisable to make Mashwara (consult) with your seniors as well as make Istikhaara (seek divine guidance). Somewhere on this site, search ‘Istikhaara’ (without quotes).

    You should also consider the advise of your parents as their advise is
    motivated by their love and concern for you.

    And Allah Ta’la Knows Best.

    Was salaam

    Mufti Ebrahim Desai
    FATWA DEPT.
    _____________________________

    so can you please tell me how the Hanafi scholars have erred? you are saying the same thing what they have said since ever…..and the reason why the guardian can get it annuled later is because of their incomptibality…..because of their social differences……if she is from a rich family and he is poor…then it will be very hard for him to take care of her because the male is usually the one who brings in the cash….now that ruling could change if after marriage she has enough money to resonably fulfill her demands….otherwise they will not be compatible…….

    whatever….
    Peace

  13. Rayhan: Your quote from the fatwa site is not accurate Hanafi interpretation. I try not to rely on the web for such things. I looked up the issue of marriage of a previously unmarried woman in “Kitabul Fiqh ala Madhahib Arba’a” by Al-Jazairi. According to the Hanfi position, in addition to the consent of the woman, her “wali” must approve the marriage. This “wali” requirement is what I disagree with.

    I disagree even more with the annulment power that Hanafis give to the guardian of a woman in case the woman and her husband are not of same social standing. While I think that generally assortative mating is fine, I don’t believe there should be sanctions against it. This rule goes against the egalitarian principles of Islam and enforces a stratified society where a poor man cannot marry a rich woman. That is WRONG. And in case the woman is not happy with her poor husband who can’t provide for her, well she could seek a divorce herself. Why does her guardian need the right to annul the marriage?

  14. >>>>Rayhan: Your quote from the fatwa site is not accurate Hanafi interpretation. I try not to rely on the web for such things.

    The http://www.ask-imam.com site is one of the most authentic hanafi sites on the web.

    >>>>>I looked up the issue of marriage of a previously unmarried woman in “Kitabul Fiqh ala Madhahib Arba`a” by Al-Jazairi.

    The above mentioned book is good, but it has mistakes in there. Plus the author is not Hanafi. I don’t really want to bore you with the references, but if you ask, I can provide you with references from Hanafi books about what I wrote.

    >>>According to the Hanfi position, in addition to the consent of the woman, her ‘wali’ must approve the marriage.

    Sorry bro…..You understood it wrong. Her Wali has the right to consent to the marriage ONLY when she gets married to someone who is NOT a suitable match for her. And if she marries herself to someone who is a suitable match (kuf’) for her, then there is agreement in the school that the marriage is valid and binding.

    >>>This “wali” requirement is what I disagree with.

    The Prophet Sallallahu alaihe wasallam says, “Whichever woman marries herself without her guardians (Wali’s) permission then her marriage is void. Her marriage is void. Her marriage is batil.” (AHMAD, TIRMIDHI, ABU DAOOD, IBN MAJAH, AND DARAMI)

    The words, “HER MARRIAGE IS VOID.” was repeated three times!!

    Now how would you answer the above hadith bro. Zack?

    Keeping the above Hadith in mind and another hadith which grants her full permission to get married without her wali’s input, the Hanafis reconciled between the two by saying that if the wali thinks there is no kufu (suitability), then the guardian has the right to consent because we care for women goddamn it! We are damned if we do and damned if we don’t! 🙂

    If there is kufu, then according to the other hadith which gives her full permission, the Hanafis say that the wali has no right to consent. And who decides if there is kufu or not? The judge of course!

    Suitability is considered in six things:

    1. Lineage, if the two parties are of Arab origin;

    2. Islam;

    3. Freedom;

    4. Wealth;

    5. Religiousness;

    6. Profession.

    Now about kufu in wealth the following is the rule for it:
    4. Wealth

    This entails the suitor possessing:

    a) the amount of mahr (dowry) that is customarily given up front (f: not the whole mahr), and

    b) a month’s support for the wife, if without a job, or being able to provide for the wife daily if with a job.

    Beyond this, having little or much wealth is of no consideration in terms of suitability.

    btw…if you go back and re-read your well written initial post this is what you will find there:”……The Hanafis (whose followers are the most numerous) are the most lenient. According to Kitab-ul-Fiqh, an adult woman has the right to marry of her own choice. The wali (guardian) has no say whatsoever if the bride and groom are of equivalent social standing……”

    I hope after reading the above your following objection will be answered.

    >>>>>>>I disagree even more with the annulment power that Hanafis give to the guardian of a woman in case the woman and her husband are not of same social standing. While I think that generally assortative mating is fine, I don’t believe there should be sanctions against it. This rule goes against the egalitarian principles of Islam and enforces a stratified society where a poor man cannot marry a rich woman. That is WRONG. And in case the woman is not happy with her poor husband who can’t provide for her, well she could seek a divorce herself.

    >>Why does her guardian need the right to annul the marriage?

    Because guardians have more experience! We don’t call them ‘guardians’ for no reason! 🙂
    How would President Bush feel if one of his daughters ran away and got herself married of to…..let’s say……..some guy off the street’s kid? It would bring shame on her family! Obviously he would feel hurt and devistated for obvious reasons!!

    And if there is a dispute, the judge will decide.

    Peace

  15. You understood it wrong.

    You got me there. I didn’t read my original post before replying to you and I got it wrong.

    Keeping the above Hadith in mind and another hadith which grants her full permission to get married without her wali’s input

    See there are conflicting Hadith on this topic. Therefore, I see no problem with taking a more lenient position.

    I have a strong objection to those 6 factors of “kufu”. That goes against my egalitarian instincts.

    Because guardians have more experience!

    That’s true for the guy as well but a man’s father does not have such control over him. Plus the guardian has his own likes/dislikes.

  16. I would not consider the ask-imam site to be one of the best sources of Hanafi fiqh.This is the same scholar who ruled that high heels were haraam, and women may only leave the house in the case of necessity. From what I have read, his answers appeal mainly to men from the subcontinent, and some of his daleel is questionable. Many times his answers simply include lines like “we should not question.”

  17. I don’t have the time to answer questions or objections so I guess I will drop it.

    If the ask-imam site is not too appealing (for obvious reasons), then there is a Hanafi fiqh group on Yahoo. There are over 2400 members from across the globe. People send in questions and reputable Hanafi scholars answer them. I really like it and the answers there are more detailed as compared to ask-imam. Here is the link to the Hanafi Yahoo fiqh group:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hanafi/

    There are groups for the other three Mazhabs as well. And if you are a Salafi (like Osama bin Ladin) then you can go to http://www.islam-qa.com for answers by a Salafi scholar.

    Peace

  18. Rayhan: Thanks for the links. I don’t follow any particular mazhab myself though I have read lots about Hanafi, Shafi, Maliki and Hanbali.

  19. aslam alikum!!!i recently done my graduation.i wanted to do masters but my dad refused as he wan me to marry one of my cousin.i don like my cousin at all and my dad is forcein me to marry him but i refused.i like someone but hes christian and he’ll convert soon.i don know what to do…im very confused.plz help me.

  20. Amira: Sorry to hear that. Hope you can convince your Dad not to force you into marriage. Sorry I can’t help you much, but you should definitely consider all available options.

  21. asalaamu alaikum… i have known a girl for nearly 4 years now and from early on wanted to marry this person but was too young… i am nearly 20 now but my mother and father condemns our marriage and say that if we ever marry we would never set foot in their house. Whereas her parents are more stricter and do not yet know of me… he parents are getting her married to som1 who she does not know in just over a months time… yet she is too afraid to confront her family as of the fair that they will dis-own her from the family… the problem also is that we are merely able to financially support our selfs if we did choose to marry… what should be the best path to take?

  22. the best thing to do would be to talk to the girls family, i know it seems difficult but believe me if you dont tell them there never gonna know are they!! it may not be as hard as you think.

    you should make it clear this is what both of you want and you would like to have there blessings insha allah all will be well. If you dont speak up you will end up kicking yourself wondering WHAT IF? and thats a bumma.

    good luck!!

  23. not all gaurdians are wise….there are many guardians who only care about money and ethnicity. if a woman is willing to marry a man who is poor and live that lifestyle, then why can’t she make that choice? she has a brain, she can undersatnd the situation. why are women always treated like children in Islam as if they can’t decide what’s best for themselves just like men can?
    why doesn’t a man need a guardian?…maybe money is not an issue with males but often times men marry for the wrong reason and yet they are allowed to maek that decision. i think it’s absolutely disgusting to accuse yoiur children of committing zina after they marry without your consent…..even if yoiu consider that to be disrespectful, how could you do that to your chldren?….anyone who does that obviously has issues and should not be anyone’s guardian in the first places. most of those cases in pakistan ahve to do with the girl or guy not marrying within their tribe or ethnicity.

  24. as salam ‘alaikum

    In our 4 schools of Jurisprudence, forced marriage is not allowed. The girl’s consent is essential. If she says “no”, then it is “no”.

    Though for her to marry someone she has to take the permission of her father in the Maliki school, however this is not a requirement in the Hanafi madhab.

    Marriage is half of islam,

    and Allah knows Best and His Nabi (saas) knows best

  25. wadood: Forced marriage is not allowed, though it does happen in a number of countries.

    Permisison of father for a girl is generally required based on a number of conditions by all madhabs. My post has the details.

  26. as salam ‘alaikum

    I think dear brother you just repeated my post.

    The Hanafi Madhab differs from the other three madhabs in the case of permission, by the stronger view.

    and Allah knows Best and His Nabi (saas)

  27. wadood: There are conditions under which Hanafi madhab also does not allow a woman to marry without her father’s permission.

    According to Kitab-ul-Fiqh, an adult woman has the right to marry of her own choice. The wali (guardian) has no say whatsoever if the bride and groom are of equivalent social standing. However, if they are not of equal standing, then the guardian has a very powerful veto. He can not only refuse to marry the woman, he can also get the marriage invalidated within a year of the wedding or before the couple have a child.

  28. as salam ‘alaikum

    Zakariyyah: Why do you assume that I dont know these conditions?

    Assuming and judging the other (assuming about his ignorance) is a great evil, and only leads to argumentation and that favourite word “fitnah”

    All I said is that the Hanafi madhab differs from the other madhabs on the issue of permission.

    You just repeated again the point of difference between the madhabs, thankyou for that

    seems like you did not read my post, though it is of no importance and only makes a general fact

    and Allah knows Best

  29. as salam ‘alaikum

    Zakariyyah:

    Please avoid argumentation, it leads to assumptions and judgements. As far as I know, I never had nor did contradict any point you said in any thread here.

    But I dont know why are you repeating my posts and making false assumptions.

    To avoid any more grudges, I would not comment nor visit your vision.com anymore

    wish you all the best with this site

    ma ‘assalama

  30. wadood: Sorry if I offended you. I was just trying to qualify your statement about the Hanafi position.

    I do hope that you visit and comment again.

  31. What is “marriage” in Islam. What is “love” in Islam? In between a consugal life of a man and a woman , if any how the man need to marry another woman , what will Islam say? In that case what is the description of “LOVE”. As per Islamic law , Then in one mind how two souls are living?

  32. If a man marries a woman and was forced into to it by his parents but never touched that woman after or had a physical or emotional relationship, is the marriage annulled?

  33. Assalamoalaikum
    I wanted to ask u a question that u said women can marry according to her will.but if her parents are not willing still she can.but if it goes opposite and men parents do not will to marry a women he likes..and if the girl is eligible enough to be married..are the parents wrong?.Islam says that society must know about the marriage but tell me one thing love marriages are never accepted here in our society nobody likes especially parents from both sides wills to make their son or daughter marriage according to their will..if nobody wills can they marry.but it is also a sin to hurt parents and dont agree with them..so what should be done if u agree to marry someone.?
    second question
    tell me one thing u said it is permissible to take another wife..well this doesn’t happen..tell me the main reason why men wills to marry a second women.when he gets everything from wife still he marry.it is impossible to balance between two wives in this century…should wife give her husband permission or if she can’t accept can she forbid her husband..tell me according to Islam..it does happens that husbands then go to other girls…what should be done that the husband gets satisfied..should she pray for her or he should try to become pious?….

  34. saba: About your 1st question, I think both a man and a woman have a right to marry whether their parents agree or not. Trying not to hurt one’s parents is important, but parents can be wrong at times as well.

    I don’t understand your 2nd question. I never said anything about it being permissible to take another wife.

  35. If a believing man and a believing woman have knowingly committed fornication, seeked Allah’s repentance and have decided to get married, is this marriage void due to the fact that the believing man and woman have already fornicated before legally getting married????

    Can any one respond to this question with some authentic proof from Qur’an or authentic hadith??? E mail me please: jaylyrikal@yahoo.com

    a salaam a laikum

  36. Mujahid: I don’t think that the marriage is void. However, I am not an Islamic scholar or mufti etc.

  37. Asslamu Aleykum!
    I am from UA thats Ukraine. Everybody knows that in this country actually Christianity heads:(((
    I am a muslim, from the Al Qirim thats the Autonomous Republic that is in parts of Ukraine Independent Government that locates above The Black Sea.I was born and lived in a muslim family, I listened to personal opinions of many muslims. So I surely realize what Islam is… But once after I finished the Crimean Turkish College for preparation in studying in World Universities, I have entered the KMA Academy that is in Kiev city (the capital city of Ukraine). I have met a Christian Girl that really attracts me. We have known each other for many months… Just she is almost orphan.I mean her mum and father just refused to help and bring her up. This way she decided as a Brave hearted Girl work and cover all her tuition fees and all her bills herself, It’s so difficult I could realize, believe me, She is only 20!!!And We really love each other. But there is still one really serious problem that bothers us to get married, that’s the religional differences, I can’t marry coz she is a chrisitian, and she can’t marry coz she afraids of smth… By the way, She is somehow got the American religion (Maybe you heard about that) The Book of Mormon. So she believe in it. We thought and considered that if we marry with different relional and mind understanding we will divorce very soon… So we decided to come to consensus that if I could prove that the Islam is the Truth she will accept and we’ll marry inshallah…
    Please, I am on the start now, I am trying to explain it, I know much things, and everything I have tried but She believes only in me and will listen only myself none else, why i am saying that I have tried to bring imams that then she refused, was afraid of them. I think you understand me well. So, please, help me, She is the person I live for.
    Soqran

  38. I know a virgin muslim girl,26, who had a boy friend. He promised to marry her and brought her to his house and slept with her. He then avoided to meet her. Can the /boy girl marry to other as Quraan states” Only Zani and Zaniah can marry each other and they cannot marry other persons”
    What should the girl do now.
    Pl mail me the answer as it is real story and the girl told me to find a solution.

  39. in pakistan or south asian people in us and canada are now most likely to marry their son or daughter in their own family like mother’s side and father’s side. and the male and female in this marriage most offen are cousins or family friends and they are rasied in front of each other and in this way these marriages are some what different than both arranges and love marriages bcz the male and female both know each since long and they are sometimes good friend or they have nice allience with one and other.

  40. I am lookig for an online arranged marriage. I am 24 years old, and my penis is 4 inches long. Love me baby. I have a nice house in West Vancouver, British Columbia, with lots of money. Email me plz

  41. Brass Crescent Awards Voting

    The nomination stage is over and it’s voting time. And it seems you like me, really like me since I have been nominated in so many categories: Best Writing Best Single Post: Two nominations for Do They Look Like Me?…

  42. Arranged Marriage

    I had completely forgotten about completing this series until I saw Yasmine comment on Abez’s blog (no permalinks; look up the June 10 post titled “How I Own 1/7th of Riaz’s heart”)….

  43. Forced Marriage: Post #1

    See my first post in this series on cousin marriages here. I’ll start out by quoting from Amnesty International’s reports about forced marriages in Pakistan as well as what sometimes happens if a woman marries someone of her own choice….

Comments are closed.