« SARS | Main | Endorsement »

جمعرات 3 اپریل 2003Thursday, April 03, 2003

Haloscan and Donations

Haloscan is down again:

I’m working on the server scripts so for around 1 hour comments will be unavailable.

That was definitely more than an hour ago. I don’t understand why they go down for maintainence so often.

I’ll probably regret this later, but because of these frequent outages of the comments, I was thinking of getting some webspace and using Movable Type. Being a poor student and all, I went ahead and put both Paypal and Amazon donation buttons on the left. Feel free to donate. Or not. Thanks.

Posted by Zack at April 3, 2003 1:13 AM in Internet

Advertisements

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.zackvision.com/mt/zv-trbk.cgi/20

Comments



zack - check out enetation.co.uk, much more reliable (and free).

Posted by: Aziz (12 comments) at April 4, 2003 2:40 PM

Movable Type is free too, it’s the webhosting that costs money

Posted by: Al-Muhajabah (260 comments) at April 4, 2003 3:28 PM

well-you could host it at your university couldn’t you? find an old dusty computer in the corner of your lab



also, webhosting is cheap, you can get decent stuff for $5/month. i pay $7/month for 400 MB of space, 8 GIG bandwidth and PHP/MySQL & perl*.



of course, if you visit my site, you know that it isn’t exactly 99.99% uptime but that’s why it’s $7/month-the extra 30 or 40 others spend is for the last .09%-99.9% is good for a hobby….



good luck.



* you might be able to pay as little as $3/month, all you need is perl really for MT. also-i get about unique 390 visits per day (being a little conservative, according to my other site meter it is more like 450) and move about 2.5 GIG month….

Posted by: razib (110 comments) at April 5, 2003 7:04 AM

Last week I upgraded my plan due to a recent surge in traffic, but my previous plan would easily cover the traffic mentioned here; it was $9.99 a month. I agree with Razib; you can get the features for less, but you also may compromise on stability. Or you may find limits on the number of server resources you can use (MT can be pretty resource-intensive at times). My personal experience has been that if you want both the features and the comfort of knowing your site and your blogging system will always be up and running, you won’t get it for much less than $10 a month.

Posted by: Al-Muhajabah (260 comments) at April 5, 2003 1:01 PM

i disagree that MT is resource intensive though, i generates .html files periodically when you ‘rebuild,’ but the only dynamic element is when you are making changes. this excludes the possibility of PHP extensions and what not that execute every time someone loads a page-though i can’t see what you would need that for….

Posted by: razib (110 comments) at April 5, 2003 10:25 PM

Razib: Regarding hosting it on a university computer, I can’t do it on a random machine because of firewall & policies etc. If I do it on my personal machine, the computer gods at my school might get angry.



I actually like Al-Muhajabah’s previous plan. It has 20GB bandwidth which is good since I plan on posting more photographs.

Posted by: Zack (1792 comments) at April 6, 2003 12:31 AM

Aziz: Thanks. In terms of features and aesthetics I like Haloscan better than enetation, but I might have to switch because of reliability.

Posted by: Zack (1792 comments) at April 6, 2003 12:32 AM

Razib - MT can be pretty resource intensive during the rebuilds. At one time last fall, I was having a major problem with the webhost’s “reaper” killing off my rebuilds for taking up too many resources. Fortunately they seem to have made some changes when they upgraded their servers a few months ago. I still occasionally see the problem when comments are being posted, but not nearly as much as before.



I spend a lot of time in the MT support forums and this is an issue that comes up regularly.

Posted by: Al-Muhajabah (260 comments) at April 6, 2003 12:16 PM

al-muh, good to know. prolly cuz they do it as “CGI,” which has to start a new process all the time. JSP/servlets would fix that since the servlet is technically the same one all the time, but well, it tends to wack out a lot too.



good luck zack. 20 GIG bandwith? i just steal bandwidth from images.google.com

Posted by: razib (110 comments) at April 6, 2003 11:35 PM

Post a comment

Note: Disagreements are welcome, but please keep it civil. Any comments full of hatred, bigotry, trolling or spam will be deleted and the commenter banned. Do read the commenting policy.

Valid XHTML: You have to preview your comment to make sure that it is valid XHTML 1.1. You will see the "Post" button on the preview page.

Urdu: To comment in Urdu, include "p[ur](urdu). " (with a space at the end and without the quotes) at the start of every Urdu paragraph. If you want to write an Urdu word(s) in an English paragraph, do it like this: %[ur](urdu)اردو%. If you want to put an English word(s) in an Urdu paragraph, write it like this: %[en](en)English words%.

PGP Signing: PGP-signed comments are encouraged. However, clearsigning Urdu text with GPGshell produces garbage.

MathML: Select the Textile with itex to MathML text filter. What you'll use is itex, which is a superset of WebTeX and differs somewhat from standard LaTeX.

Text Filters: For regular comments, whether in English or Urdu, keep the text filter setting to its default of Textile 2. Change it to Textile with itex to MathML when writing MathML.




Remember Me?