« Blog Milestone | Main | Favorite Presidential Lies »
منگل 26 اگست 2003Tuesday, August 26, 2003
Immigration Reading
Here’s some stuff I have been reading (via Perverse Access Memory).
- Matt Welch posts about some of the problems immigrants had in the US in the past and how people consider that era now to be whitewashed into nice assimilation of immigrants.
- Henry Farrell writes about his recent experience with immigration requirements while returning to the US with a one-way ticket.
- Here’s a New York Times article about the Mexican ID being accepted for identification in some cities in the Midwest.
- Also a USA Today report about immigrants moving into the interior from expensive states like California and New York.
- And finally a NY Times article about biometric identifiers for visas and passports.
It should be remembered that if we require visitors to have passports with biometric data for the visa waiver program, for example, then the other countries might start implementing it for Americans since most of these requirements are generally reciprocal.
The article does have its share of goofs:
Biometric systems tested by the United States at the Mexican border have been sensitive enough to distinguish between identical twins.
What does that mean? Any data on false positives as well as negatives?
Under the new standards, countries would also be allowed to add additional biometric technologies to the passports, like fingerprints or iris scans.
Now photographs and fingerprints are well-established, but iris scans? Do we really want to get our irises scanned?
But Mr. Shagnon said the passport system relies partly on facial measurements that do not change as people age or even get plastic surgery.
Now really? Every facial recognition system breaks down at some point. A good system must be able to differentiate among millions of people while at the same time being robust to lighting, facial expression and changes in facial appearance from day to day. I am not considering pose here since it can be assumed that for applications like this the subject will be facing the camera.
Posted by Zack at August 26, 2003 3:33 AM in Immigration
Advertisements
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.zackvision.com/mt/zv-trbk.cgi/430
Comments
Posted by: Al-Muhajabah (260 comments) at August 26, 2003 9:50 PM
Ginger Stampley used to work in immigration law and posts interesting stuff about immigration sometimes. Manifest Border is a weblog by an immigration lawyer, but he posts irregularly and usually briefly. Plus he’s a bit too fond of the Washington Times.
Posted by: Zack (1768 comments) at August 27, 2003 6:39 PM
Post a comment
Note: Disagreements are welcome, but please keep it civil. Any comments full of hatred, bigotry, trolling or spam will be deleted and the commenter banned. Do read the commenting policy.
Valid XHTML: You have to preview your comment to make sure that it is valid XHTML 1.1. You will see the "Post" button on the preview page.
Urdu: To comment in Urdu, include "p[ur](urdu). " (with a space at the end and without the quotes) at the start of every Urdu paragraph. If you want to write an Urdu word(s) in an English paragraph, do it like this: %[ur](urdu)اردو%. If you want to put an English word(s) in an Urdu paragraph, write it like this: %[en](en)English words%.
PGP Signing: PGP-signed comments are encouraged. However, clearsigning Urdu text with GPGshell produces garbage.
MathML: Select the Textile with itex to MathML text filter. What you'll use is itex, which is a superset of WebTeX and differs somewhat from standard LaTeX.
Text Filters: For regular comments, whether in English or Urdu, keep the text filter setting to its default of Textile 2. Change it to Textile with itex to MathML when writing MathML.
Thanks for posting these links. I’m working to educate myself on immigration law.