« Doing Website with MT | Main | Muslims and Evolution »
منگل 19 اگست 2003Tuesday, August 19, 2003
Movies We Watched
Narc: An interesting movie, but not as good as Training Day.
25th Hour: I did not like this movie. It did not hang together as well as it should have. Too bad since the premise was interesting.
Frida: I liked the way they used the paintings for some animations and moods.
The Quiet American: I haven’t read the book and I think books are always better than their movie adaptations. I did not see the dichotomy between the British journalist and the American CIA guy. They seemed similar except for the sunny optimism of an American and the typical pessimistic (or realist, as a British friend pointed out last week) attitude of the British. The movie was quite good though.
Posted by Zack at August 19, 2003 2:35 PM in Movies
Advertisements
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.zackvision.com/mt/zv-trbk.cgi/416
Comments
Posted by: sal (1 comments) at August 19, 2003 5:40 PM
sal: Guy is a grad student, gal a freshman (I think), got married on July 19. If that’s the one you are talking about, I know him well. Haven’t met her yet, but will do soon. We attended their wedding.
Posted by: Zack (1802 comments) at August 19, 2003 6:41 PM
Re: movies better than books - “Jaws”, “The Godfather”, and “2001” are all miles better than the book (I think the original novel of 2001 had a different title, although I can’t remember what it was). It helps that they were awful books, but they are still very, very good movies.
That being said, I can’t think of any movie made out of a good book that was made into an even beter movie. Maybe “Rashomon”, although I haven’t read the book. Novels are usually just to big, generally, to make successful movies out of. Short stories work better, usually.
Posted by: Andrew Northrup (39 comments) at August 19, 2003 6:52 PM
Andrew: Agreed about 2001, Jaws and Godfather. 2001 was actually adapted from a short story “Sentinel” by Arthur C. Clarke. The story only covered a small portion of the movie. I think it didn’t have Hal or the journey to Jupiter. Clarke and Kubrick collaborated on the screnplay and a novel was also published.
I also agree that novels are too long to adapt to a movie in general. A novella or short story works much better. A good example is Lord of the Rings. The movies are good and pretty long but they skip quite a few things from the books.
Posted by: Zack (1802 comments) at August 19, 2003 7:27 PM
Yeah, you’re right about about 2001. I think I read the novelization of the movie, which I thought wasn’t very true to the spirit of the film, but that’s a whole other conversation. Also to the better movie list I’d add “Psycho”, and also the Humphrey Bogart “The Maltese Falcon”. I never actually read the book of The Maltese Falcon, but I just have a hard time believing it could be any better.
I agree on LOTR. I think some of the stuff they cut was for the good (the singing, mainly - can you imagine?), most of it was necessary to keep the story moving, and they probably should have tried to cut even more. It has to have been really tough, because the books are just way too long, and I think that they did a pretty impressive job, overall. But not better than the books.
Posted by: Andrew Northrup (39 comments) at August 19, 2003 9:25 PM
Andrew: Haven’t read the Psycho book, but the Maltese falcon book was pretty good as well.
All the stuff in the LOTR books helps create that world though and is fun (except the singing of course).
Posted by: Zack (1802 comments) at August 19, 2003 11:18 PM
yuuuuuuuup ur right!!!!!!! the girl and her sis’s are good friends of mine! this is so unbelievable..heh..i was at the wedding too
Posted by: sal (1 comments) at August 20, 2003 8:22 AM
but umm if u do meet her dont say u know me from my blog!!!!!!!! veryyy few peoplei know in real life knowof my blog..ya paranoia..no i writestuff thats personal thatswhy
Posted by: sal (1 comments) at August 20, 2003 8:24 AM
Two more examples of movies-better-than-books-they’re-based-on, in my opinion: “Last of the Mohicans,” and “The Hunt for Red October.” Both also bear out the idea that the book shouldn’t be all that good. Plus I think J.F.Cooper might have been a good screenwriter or director.
Posted by: Thomas Nephew (1 comments) at August 20, 2003 2:14 PM
sal: Small world! OK.
Thomas: Agreed about “Hunt for Red October”. Don’t know about the Mohicans.
Posted by: Zack (1802 comments) at August 20, 2003 4:34 PM
Post a comment
Note: Disagreements are welcome, but please keep it civil. Any comments full of hatred, bigotry, trolling or spam will be deleted and the commenter banned. Do read the commenting policy.
Valid XHTML: You have to preview your comment to make sure that it is valid XHTML 1.1. You will see the "Post" button on the preview page.
Urdu: To comment in Urdu, include "p[ur](urdu). " (with a space at the end and without the quotes) at the start of every Urdu paragraph. If you want to write an Urdu word(s) in an English paragraph, do it like this: %[ur](urdu)اردو%. If you want to put an English word(s) in an Urdu paragraph, write it like this: %[en](en)English words%.
PGP Signing: PGP-signed comments are encouraged. However, clearsigning Urdu text with GPGshell produces garbage.
MathML: Select the Textile with itex to MathML text filter. What you'll use is itex, which is a superset of WebTeX and differs somewhat from standard LaTeX.
Text Filters: For regular comments, whether in English or Urdu, keep the text filter setting to its default of Textile 2. Change it to Textile with itex to MathML when writing MathML.
hey so do uknow this muslim pakicouple that recently got married andgoto GA tech…