« Doctor or Midwife? | Main | Pattern Recognition »
اتوار 4 جولائی 2004Sunday, July 04, 2004
Bruised Pakistanis
I was just minding my own business and making plans to go home to Jersey for the long weekend when I heard Pakistanis were under suspicion.
The US Department of Homeland Security has alerted six major airports in the United States to carefully monitor all travellers of Pakistani origin, including US citizens.
How exactly can one find out whether a US citizen is of Pakistani descent? Can you differentiate a Pakistani from an Indian, Iranian, or Afghan? I can’t and I am a Pakistani myself.
The order was circulated through a DHS memo, warning airports in Washington, New York, New Jersey, Detroit, Chicago and Los Angeles to look for Pakistani travellers with suspected links to terrorists.
The action memo sent to US Customs and Border Protection officials says the suspects may be planning terrorist attacks in the United States between now and the presidential election in November. The memo asks customs officials to look for signs that indicate paramilitary training such as unusual rope-burns, scars and bruises.
Since I was coming to Newark airport on the 2nd, I looked at my bathroom mirror carefully looking for any scars or bruises before going to the airport. Fortunately, I had none.
The June 17 memo mentions recent Pakistani raids near the Afghan border and Pakistani official sources told Dawn that the initial information about these individuals was collected in the border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The DHS memo indicates that the suspects were “travelling to train at terrorist camps in Pakistan,” said an official familiar with the warning.
Damn the day Pakistan became such a terrorist hotspot. Damn you, Ziaul Haq and Reagan and Brezhnev and the terrorist groups as well.
Needing more details, I googled and found the CNN version.
A two-page “action” bulletin, dated June 17, says recent intelligence from Pakistan and elsewhere indicates that people of Pakistani descent “are increasingly being identified with” extremist activities, “including supporting [and] protecting the operations of terrorist training camps in Pakistan.”
Wow, that’s news to me! (Yes, I am being sarcastic.)
In the bulletin, airport inspectors are advised to closely look at people of Pakistani descent who have taken short trips to Pakistan that were not related to family or business reasons and examine them for injuries like “rope burns … unusual bruises … [and] scars,” – injuries that may have come from training in terror camps.
Ah, at least I am safe until I visit Pakistan. Domestic travel hasn’t been a problem at all for me and I hope it won’t become one now. What nationality would you guess I belong to if you didn’t know I was Pakistani?
Obviously, the Pakistanis can’t be expected to take this well.
Pakistan Thursday decried as unwarranted a US order requiring inspectors at the major American airports to closely examine all the passengers of Pakistani descent for any terrorist links.
“We have taken up the matter with the US authorities,” Deputy Chief of Mission at the Pakistan embassy in Washington, Mohammad Sadiq, told this scribe.
He said the move could undermine the close relationship between Pakistan and the United States in the fight against terrorism. “It is not only unfortunate, but based on ignorance,” said Mr Sadiq. “Warnings like these … harm a lot to us, Pakistani Americans and the Pakistani citizens visiting United States.”
The Pakistan-specific move comes less than a month after the Bush administration declared Pakistan as a major Non-NATO ally of the United States. It is also unwarranted as the United States calls President Pervez Musharraf as a ‘key ally in the war on terrorism’.
Sarcasm aside, I have no idea how to react to this Homeland Security memo. It all depends on how it’s implemented. It could be very narrowly focussed and thus not affect any (innocent) Pakistanis or Pakistani-Americans. Or it could turn into full-scale ethnic profiling. My guess is some airport inspectors will be obnoxious (just like they were even before this memo) and others will be careful.
One thing I don’t understand is why the memo even needs to specifically mention Pakistani descent when what it seems to be on the lookout for is people coming from Pakistan with terrorist training. Is there any specific information on Pakistani terrorists, as distinct from non-Pakistanis trained in Pakistan, that this memo is based on?
Posted by Zack at July 4, 2004 12:09 AM in Pakistan
Advertisements
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.zackvision.com/mt/zv-trbk.cgi/700
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bruised Pakistanis:
» Auto-trackback from memigo.com from memigo
CNN article was added to memigo. Thanks!
Follow trackback to find related articles... [Read More]
Tracked on July 4, 2004 5:04 AM
Comments
Posted by: stress (28 comments) at July 4, 2004 11:09 PM
After reading the said memo, my first impression was that some hired agent of the US agengies has given a report that he/she prepared comfortably sitting in airconditioned room of a 5-star hotel, and that he/she has no knowledge what is going around.
Pakistan government who, just to get to a few (dubbed) well-wishers of Taliban in Wana (Wazirastan), killed dozens of innocent Pakistanis (women & children included) and razed to ground hundreds of houses/shops of poor people, how can it allow any terrorist training in Pakistan?
Posted by: A Pakistani (7 comments) at July 5, 2004 5:53 AM
Well americans have aright to safeguard their interests and make sure they are not attacked again. well i know i wouldnt agree with the way they are doing this but u know…
Posted by: Moiz (62 comments) at July 5, 2004 1:02 PM
stress: I think it’s in the eyebrows right? Or the earlobes?
Earlobes. That’s why I gre my hair long to hide the marks. :-)
reverse brain drain
From anecdotal evidence, most Pakistanis leaving the US end up in Canada rather than Pakistan.
A Pakistani: The Pakistani government does strange and contradictory things all the time. The memo, however, was definitely written from an air-conditioned room. :-)
Moiz: That’s why I am sort of conflicted about this.
Posted by: Zack (1838 comments) at July 5, 2004 6:30 PM
I think this may just be shoddy reporting. I’d really like to see the original memo; I think the CNN reporter may have been reading more into this than there was.
Specifically, the original story says “…monitor all travellers of Pakistani origin, including US citizens.” In that context, origin to me would imply “people travelling from Pakistan,” regardless of their ethnicity, including US citizens. Certainly something inspectors could tell from a person’s travel documentation, without having to examine their earlobes.
Now, the question is, did the original memo go on to talk about people of Pakistani “descent” or did the CNN reporter assume that “origin” meant “descent?” Without reading the memo ourselves, we can’t seperate bigotry from poor reporting.
Posted by: Brett A. Thomas (1 comments) at July 12, 2004 9:49 PM
Brett: You might be up to something there.
Posted by: Zack (1838 comments) at July 12, 2004 11:36 PM
americans should be attacked once again !!!
Posted by: shahbaz (7 comments) at July 18, 2006 5:05 PM
shahbaz: Wishing harm on somebody is not good.
Posted by: Zack (1838 comments) at July 26, 2006 6:33 PM | PGP Sig
Post a comment
Note: Disagreements are welcome, but please keep it civil. Any comments full of hatred, bigotry, trolling or spam will be deleted and the commenter banned. Do read the commenting policy.
Valid XHTML: You have to preview your comment to make sure that it is valid XHTML 1.1. You will see the "Post" button on the preview page.
Urdu: To comment in Urdu, include "p[ur](urdu). " (with a space at the end and without the quotes) at the start of every Urdu paragraph. If you want to write an Urdu word(s) in an English paragraph, do it like this: %[ur](urdu)اردو%. If you want to put an English word(s) in an Urdu paragraph, write it like this: %[en](en)English words%.
PGP Signing: PGP-signed comments are encouraged. However, clearsigning Urdu text with GPGshell produces garbage.
MathML: Select the Textile with itex to MathML text filter. What you'll use is itex, which is a superset of WebTeX and differs somewhat from standard LaTeX.
Text Filters: For regular comments, whether in English or Urdu, keep the text filter setting to its default of Textile 2. Change it to Textile with itex to MathML when writing MathML.
I think it’s in the eyebrows right? Or the earlobes?
I saw a pretty good BBC program the other day about Pakistani immigrants in the US post September 11th. They talked to a lot of people who were deported for minor visa violations. It was pretty sad - a lot of parents torn between bringing their American kids with them or not (the kids usually prefered the US and stability but obviously wanted to be with their parents). One interesting detail they got from talking to some young Pakistanis (in Pak) was that they thought a silver lining might be a reverse brain drain - that if educated and motivated Pakistanis were forced to go back they would improve the situation there.