Being a fan of Spiderman since my childhood, I have loved the Spiderman series of movies. While I enjoyed Spider-man 3, its plot is a bit week. I rate it 7/10.

Spider-man 2 rocked, you were right. It is the first movie every that I was so absorbed in it that I forgot I was in a theatre!

And you are also right that Superman is the most boring superhero ever.

Ikram: Such hatred towards movies!

I would do Bollywood reviews except that we don’t watch many Bollywood movies.

But I hated “before sunrise” even more. It’s possibly the worst movie I’ve ever seen. I look forward to not seeing “before sunset”.

Fahrenheit 911 I’ll skip. I know most of that crap already, and only beleive half of it. I want escapism from my cinema not in-your-face politics.

How about some Bollywood reviews?

Not necessarily a solid argument, just a “hey, look at this, it smells fishy to me, don’t it smell fishy to you?”

The footage of Bush was priceless, and Saddam dancing was nice. I was particularly moved by the woman yelling and pleading to God (Allah) to avenge the deaths of her family.

Thabet: Moore has characterized F9/11 as an opinion piece. So, it does seem somewhat unreasonable of me to ask for an unbiased picture. However, I think there is enough factual material, especially on the Iraq war, to do a good job against the Bush administration. See, for example, Jon Stewart’s coverage of “Mess’o potamia”.

And Superman is the most boring superhero.

Soljah: We’ll most likely see “Before Sunset” in Montclair, NJ.

CA: I mostly agree (but see my caveat above.) I think Moore’s movie is directed towards a very different audience than news junkies like me. If the reaction in my central Jersey theater is any indication, Bush is in trouble.

The defense team includes some powerful “lawyers”. The public relations machinery of an incumbent whitehouse is chief among them. Ari Fleischer is a slippery fellow, buttery if you will. D. Rumsfeld and his entourage of generals and admirals in well starched dress uniforms can also impress. The GOP fulfills its traditional role in this regard. And, let one not forget the Fox “news” network.

What of the prosecution? Well, the democrats act as a foil for the GOP. Nader and Kucinich add color to the team – but little else. But, what can match the gravitas of men in uniform or reach of an entire news network? “Better hair,” perhaps. Setting aside coiffures, propaganda pieces such as the debt add by Moveon.org and Moore’s F. 9-11 are the only effective response to Fox and Rumsfeld the prosecution can offer.

I do not seek The Truth in such works, but I see elements of truth. I do not believe that American troops are murderous thugs hyped on rock and roll, as one part of F9-11 portrays. The majority of men who face combat are haunted by the experience until the end of their days, regardless of their thoughts when they pulled the trigger. However, the response of congressmen to Moore’s attempt to solicit sons and daughters for the armed forces reveals something of the truth. The fact that but one member of that august body has an enlisted child screams it. The Bush administration did what it could to circumvent Congress, and Congress had too little personal commitment to restrain the nation’s trigger finger.

Discussion of truthful elements could continue, but this is not the point of my comment. Put simply, in the courtroom of the democratic process, both sides must argue their sides with equal skill and force if the electorate is to choose wisely. F9-11 reinforces a flagging prosecution.

I think, however, it was distasteful of him to shove the camera in the face of the women had lost her son, when she was outside the White House. The crowd in the cinema I saw it was defnitely anti-Bush; people were crying at the sight of dead and mutilated people, and you could hear the disgust people felt for Bush & co., as well as the views of some American soldiers.

As for superheroes, surely there’s no one better than Superman himself.